>>>>> "Kim" == Kim C Callis <[email protected]> writes:
Kim> I think recently, I made a comment that I was trying to put Kim> together a wireless community at a Marina here in Portland. I Kim> have decided on the equipment and the only thing I am lacking now Kim> is a peer review from my peer who are without peer! :) Wait, Portland as in Portland Oregon? Like Personal Telco Portland? Kim> [...] So that is it in a nutshell, and I look for anything that Kim> you guys want to offer.... If it was me, I'd use 5.8GHz Ubiquiti Bullets with directional antennas for the hop over the channel, running WDS to bridge, then use NanoStations or similar, or Bullets with lower gain omni's (9 dBi) for end-user coverage. High power is usually a waste for connecting end-users, ask MetroFi. Oh, wait, you can't since they don't exist anymore. I wouldn't bother with 11n, except maybe for the cross-channel hop where it can give more capacity with wider 40 MHz channels, since most users still have a/b/g/ client devices. Use wires as much as possible to connect access points. My $0.02. -- Russell Senior, President [email protected] _______________________________________________ SoCalFreeNet.org General Discussion List To unsubscribe, please visit: http://socalfreenet.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_socalfreenet.org
