On Thursday, February 27, 2014 18:21:45 Michael Griesacker wrote: > * Devin: Let's put a 100% freeze on all new funds until we figure out a > game plan for it. Use a financial advisor, Miami Foundation. - That's > from the minutes
Written like that, it looks like we're not allowed to spend any new money at all, including dues or donations. Why are we picking Miami Foundation as a financial advisor? > > On Feb 27, 2014 4:48 PM, "Torrie Fischer" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 27, 2014 4:38 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > There has been a misunderstanding. My proposal last night was filed > > > > under discussion items, I am not sure as to why. > > > > I dont remember you saying anything was a proposal. What in particular are > > you talking about, and what's the wording you are proposing? > > > > > D. > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Torrie Fischer <[email protected]> > > > To: [email protected]; SYN/HAK discussion list <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 11:48 PM > > > Subject: Re: [SH-Discuss] Meeting minutes from 2014-02-25 > > > > > > On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 13:50:20 [email protected] wrote: > > > > Torrie, > > > > While I appreciate your input, I don't feel your "implied authority" > > > > argument is valid. I do not see the need to change the proposal at > > > > this > > > > time. > > > > > > Whoah whoah whoah, when did this become a proposal with any kind of real > > > wording? This was discussion about working on the idea. > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Devin Wolfe > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > From: Torrie Fischer <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > To: SYN/HAK discussion list <[email protected]> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:28 AM > > > > Subject: Re: [SH-Discuss] Meeting minutes from 2014-02-25 > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 06:17:31 [email protected] wrote: > > > > > I don't follow. If you have stated many times, champions do not have > > > > > authority. Why would anti-authoritarian-type-people have any issue > > > > with > > > > > > > this what so ever? They would just serve as another member on the > > > > > committee > > > > > concerned about the growth of SYNHAK. > > > > > > > > Technically, they have no authority. > > > > > > > > Realistically, champions have been called the leaders of SYNHAK, > > > > benevolent > > > > > > dictator for life, presidents, directors, and many other titles that > > > > imply > > > > > > some kind of authority. > > > > > > > > Consider also the situation of a champion taking over another > > > > officer's job > > > > > > while they're still on the CWG. Suddenly they are on the CWG and have > > > > actual > > > > > > powers. > > > > > > > > > Devin. > > > > > > > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Discuss mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
