On Thursday, February 27, 2014 21:58:00 a l wrote: > My understanding of the working group was that they would come up with > plans to suggest to the board and members as to hope to allocate funds. > This doesn't require a proposal since each disbursement would be a proposal > or board action.
Sounds reasonable. > > Perhaps I misunderstood the intent though. > > Regards, > Andrew L > > On Feb 27, 2014 6:31 PM, "Michael Griesacker" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Also: > > ** Justin: Proposes that we create a working group for this grant. > > ** Tim: Do they have specific restrictions? > > *** They use the words "charitable use." Which carries more meaning than > > may appear at the surface. > > On Feb 27, 2014 6:21 PM, "Michael Griesacker" <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > >> * Devin: Let's put a 100% freeze on all new funds until we figure out a > >> game plan for it. Use a financial advisor, Miami Foundation. - That's > >> from the minutes > >> On Feb 27, 2014 4:48 PM, "Torrie Fischer" <[email protected]> > >> > >> wrote: > >>> On Feb 27, 2014 4:38 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >>> > There has been a misunderstanding. My proposal last night was filed > >>> > >>> under discussion items, I am not sure as to why. > >>> > >>> I dont remember you saying anything was a proposal. What in particular > >>> are you talking about, and what's the wording you are proposing? > >>> > >>> > D. > >>> > > >>> > ________________________________ > >>> > From: Torrie Fischer <[email protected]> > >>> > To: [email protected]; SYN/HAK discussion list <[email protected]> > >>> > > >>> > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 11:48 PM > >>> > Subject: Re: [SH-Discuss] Meeting minutes from 2014-02-25 > >>> > > >>> > On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 13:50:20 [email protected] wrote: > >>> > > Torrie, > >>> > > While I appreciate your input, I don't feel your "implied authority" > >>> > > argument is valid. I do not see the need to change the proposal at > >>> > >>> this > >>> > >>> > > time. > >>> > > >>> > Whoah whoah whoah, when did this become a proposal with any kind of > >>> > >>> real > >>> > >>> > wording? This was discussion about working on the idea. > >>> > > >>> > > Thanks, > >>> > > > >>> > > Devin Wolfe > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > ________________________________ > >>> > > > >>> > > From: Torrie Fischer <[email protected]> > >>> > > > >>> > > To: SYN/HAK discussion list <[email protected]> > >>> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:28 AM > >>> > > Subject: Re: [SH-Discuss] Meeting minutes from 2014-02-25 > >>> > > > >>> > > On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 06:17:31 [email protected] wrote: > >>> > > > I don't follow. If you have stated many times, champions do not > >>> > >>> have > >>> > >>> > > > authority. Why would anti-authoritarian-type-people have any issue > >>> > >>> with > >>> > >>> > > > this what so ever? They would just serve as another member on the > >>> > > > committee > >>> > > > concerned about the growth of SYNHAK. > >>> > > > >>> > > Technically, they have no authority. > >>> > > > >>> > > Realistically, champions have been called the leaders of SYNHAK, > >>> > >>> benevolent > >>> > >>> > > dictator for life, presidents, directors, and many other titles that > >>> > >>> imply > >>> > >>> > > some kind of authority. > >>> > > > >>> > > Consider also the situation of a champion taking over another > >>> > >>> officer's job > >>> > >>> > > while they're still on the CWG. Suddenly they are on the CWG and > >>> > >>> have actual > >>> > >>> > > powers. > >>> > > > >>> > > > Devin. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > >>> > > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ > >>> > > Discuss mailing list > >>> > > [email protected] > >>> > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Discuss mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
