On Wednesday, March 05, 2014 05:05:19 Andrew Buczko wrote:
> I find it Un-excellent that you bring this up at the meeting and then
> proceed to ignore the discussion to write this email. Is it really that
> important that it can't wait until after the meeting?
> 

Didn't realize it was a huge issue to write down the exact wording we were 
working on during the meeting, read it out loud, then immediately send it.

I'll be sure to not do anything productive during the next meeting. Didn't 
realize you had such an issue with it, sorry.

> Besides you where there at the meeting, the meetings are for discussion/s,
> if you are going to come for the meeting then please participate in the
> meeting.
> 
> Please./ thank you
> Andy
> 
> PS, the Associate Member ship sounds great.
> 
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Torrie Fischer 
<[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 04, 2014 20:11:49 Torrie Fischer wrote:
> > > As we discussed in the meeting today, here's the formal proposal I'd
> > 
> > like to
> > 
> > > put forth:
> > > 
> > > ---8<---
> > > * There shall be an additional class of members called Associate
> > > Members.
> > > * Associate Members are an entirely separate class from the standard
> > 
> > class
> > 
> > > of Members as established in the bylaws
> > > * Associate Members gain no additional benefits or privileges over
> > 
> > Members
> > 
> > > or non-members
> > > * The protocol for receiving Associate Membership status shall be:
> > > ** One sponsorship from a full Active Member
> > > ** Three sponsorships from either Active Members or Associate Members
> > > --->8---
> > > 
> > > The protocol for removing associate membership status will be determined
> > 
> > in
> > 
> > > the future, probably via the CWG.
> > 
> > Ack, forgot to mention that this should be implemented via the wiki.
> > 
> > Users can create their page, and others can edit the page to add their
> > sponsorships. Just a super simple list on the page, which is trivial to do
> > in
> > mediawiki syntax. I'll document my idea tonight with an example in the
> > membership sandbox page.
> > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Discuss mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to