Omar,
firstly, that's a little too much detail for 'discuss', and should be
reserved to 'members', please excercise some diplomacy. Secondly I take
offense to requesting the deposing of a boardmember for "unboardliness"
-that sounds like a slippery slope. Thirdly, likening Andy's usefullness to
some guy with tools is a bit too much. This isn't helping.


On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Omar Rassi <[email protected]> wrote:

> Devin,
>
> Our response to Andy's complaint was that he should go talk to Torrie and
> try to work out his issues. At that time he was offered mediation. This did
> not happen though the issues he brought up were discussed with Torrie
> anonymously (now that's out of the bag). Fast forward to now, it has been
> brought up that the champions need to try to open a dialogue between them
> because Torrie is clamming up regarding Andy (she has said multiple times
> in private she feels hostility from Andy when trying to talk to him). Andy
> was again asked to come and talk with a mediator, and then asked again.
> Andy's response to flatly refuse to attempt dialogue and deny that there's
> a problem between them while the same time calling Torrie a name. This is
> not appropriate behavior from a board member of synhak to an officer of
> synhak. It makes no difference to me what their friendship is, but to
> refuse cooperation and even the attempt to come to an understanding with
> eachother a good board member does not make. Make no mistake, Andy has been
> good to the space and is a good person. But just because you have a
> crimping tool with the socket set doesn't mean its going to be useful. The
> call is for the board and members to discuss if he is still a good fit for
> board nothing more. his membership status is not in question nor at stake.
> I would rather not remove anyone from anything but what is the alternative
> if one officer is unwilling to talk to the other?
> On Apr 14, 2014 12:18 PM, "a l" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Calling people out in public is not the best nor most mature way of
>> handling issues. Everyone here has each other's emails. If you're concerned
>> about transparency and fairness for resolving issues we have Members@.
>> I'd wager most of discuss isn't concerned with whether two of our core
>> members are getting along.
>> I as a member am only concerned that two of our core members are not
>> talking to each other.
>> I don't care if it's tin can and string, IRC, snapchat, smoke signals or
>> binding arbitration. If two members can't communicate to each other we're a
>> worthless community. How can we expect to attract new members if we're
>> having trouble getting along with ourselves?
>>
>> regards,
>> Andrew L
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Torrie Fischer <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday, April 14, 2014 08:46:00 Devin Wolfe wrote:
>>> > So I have been watching this and I have a question.
>>> >
>>> > What exactly did Andy do to warrant removal from the board?
>>> >
>>> > From my end it looks like:
>>> >
>>> > He had a problem with another member, so he verbally addressed it.
>>> > He then brought it to that attention of the champions, again verbally.
>>> > He then filed a formal complaint with the champions
>>> > He continued to verbally address the situation.
>>> > Torrie publicly announced she was ignoring his emails (on IRC)
>>>
>>> Uh, what? I did nothing of that. Andy did nothing of that.
>>>
>>> The complaint was an anonymous member. Andy has not addressed anything.
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Now you are trying to kick Andy out for not meeting with you when you
>>> > request it? Is he not doing his job as a board member? Has he
>>> threatened or
>>> > phisicaly harmed Torrie or any other member?
>>> >
>>> > What's the problem? People don't always get along, THAT IS LIFE. This
>>> is a
>>> > volunteer organization that without members that work so hard for FREE
>>> and
>>> > pay the be here, we would not exist.
>>> >
>>> > Frankly I am disgusted that you would even suggest this.
>>> >
>>> > Devin.
>>> >
>>> > On Apr 14, 2014 1:04 AM, "Andrew Buczko" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > Andrew
>>> > > I have a busy month this month. Everything happens in April! I will
>>> not be
>>> > > able to respond to requests within 5 days.
>>> > >
>>> > > Here is what's going on for April:
>>> > >
>>> > > -My Mother's B-Day
>>> > >
>>> > > The North American Model Engineering Society
>>> > > Web: http://www.namesexposition.com/
>>> > > Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6BtmpYoxPQ
>>> > >
>>> > > Notacon
>>> > > Web: http://www.notacon.org/
>>> > > Video:
>>> > >
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4msp8SFl_k&list=PLuYlHJrLmrZfPu0HFdMVfyMY
>>> > > F2C4UwjlO
>>> > >
>>> > > Cleveland Mini Maker Fair
>>> > > Web: http://makerfairecleveland.com/
>>> > > Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhrB32n5hNw
>>> > >
>>> > > Akron Brony Meetup
>>> > > Web: http://www.meetup.com/Akron-Brony-Meetup/events/169761202/
>>> > > Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6In3lrMFkYk
>>> > >
>>> > > Slot Car Racing
>>> > > Web: http://ohioho.com/OhioHOPRA.html
>>> > > Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRxhCTcm1Y8
>>> > >
>>> > > Cuyahoga Falls Amateur Radio Club 60th Annual HAMFEST
>>> > > Web: http://www.cfarc.org/hamfest2014.php
>>> > > Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6rfQq3onbA
>>> > >
>>> > > Add this to the fact that I work two jobs and you can tell that I am
>>> going
>>> > > to be busy.
>>> > > Andrew
>>> > >
>>> > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 8:10 PM, a l <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > >> If the parties involved agree to meet in person that's great. Not
>>> > >> everyone will want/be able to. Getting people communicating to each
>>> > >> other,
>>> > >> even through an intermediary, should be to goal. How it is
>>> accomplished
>>> > >> should be left to them.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Sure, we've had misunderstandings due to words not conveying
>>> mannerisms.
>>> > >> We've also had polite conversation devolve into a shouting match.
>>> Neither
>>> > >> form is perfect.
>>> > >> In the end communication is key. Not talking, communicating. If both
>>> > >> sides are talking but neither is -listening- it won't matter if
>>> they're
>>> > >> using carrier pigeons or lawyers.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> "If what is said is not what is meant then what ought to be done
>>> remains
>>> > >> undone"  -Confucious
>>> > >>
>>> > >> regards,
>>> > >> Andrew L
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Torrie Fischer <
>>> [email protected]
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > wrote:
>>> > >>> On Sunday, April 13, 2014 15:25:27 Becca Salchak wrote:
>>> > >>> > My issue with dealing with it over email is:
>>> > >>> > -yes people tend to feel more free and open but we have had
>>> issues in
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> the
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> > past with emails being misinterpreted.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> They happened in the past, and they'll happen again :)
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> > - these are personal conflicts and i feel the best way to solve
>>> these
>>> > >>> > problems is face to face with a peace keeper in the middle
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> +1
>>> > >>> _______________________________________________
>>> > >>> Discuss mailing list
>>> > >>> [email protected]
>>> > >>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>> > >>
>>> > >> _______________________________________________
>>> > >> Discuss mailing list
>>> > >> [email protected]
>>> > >> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>> > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > Discuss mailing list
>>> > > [email protected]
>>> > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to