Sure send it to my email directly.
I missed your last ACFUG preso.

Robert Lash


On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Dean H. Saxe <[email protected]>wrote:

> Sorry. I call bs. Java has great crypto libraries if you know how to use
> them. Cf is java. Ergo, cf has great crypto libraries.  CF itself has
> terrible built in l functions for crypto, however.
>
>
> If you want a talk I did on this at Webmaniacs last year, email me.
>
> -dhs
>
> On Feb 9, 2009, at 3:36 PM, "Shane" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Yes.  Asp.net has better encryption capabilities than CF.  Might require a
> few lines of code but it is readily available.  Visual Studio makes it easy.
>
>  <http://www.CTek-Media.com>www.CTek-Media.com
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Robert Lash
> *Sent:* Monday, February 09, 2009 1:53 PM
> *To:* <[email protected]>[email protected]
> *Subject:* [ACFUG Discuss] multi-language encryption
>
> A recent project has brought a security question between CF and ASP.Net.
>
> Can I assume ASP.Net would have AES encryption/decryption capabilities and
> that if the key was available decryption would be possible?
>
> What I am looking to accomplish is to encrypt data, transmit encrypted
> data, and have the asp.net client be able to decrypt it.
>
> Robert
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - <http://www.avg.com>www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.233 / Virus Database: 270.10.19/1940 - Release Date: 02/08/09
> 17:57:00
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
> <http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform>
> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
>
> For more info, see <http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists>
> http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
> Archive @ <http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
> List hosted by FusionLink <http://www.fusionlink.com>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

Reply via email to