Frank,

I know PostParametersLimit is a different issue than the security fix, if
thats what you were trying to imply. I meant that since the security fix is
CUMULATIVE fix, we saw it for the first time after applying security
fix(because we had not patched up our servers with earlier
hotfixes/patches).

So PostParametersLimit = No. of form fields, where as postSizeLimit =
sizein MB of how big the post Size (form) can get.

Thanks,

<Ajas Mohammed />
iUseDropbox(http://db.tt/63Lvone9)
http://ajashadi.blogspot.com
We cannot become what we need to be, remaining what we are.
No matter what, find a way. Because thats what winners do.
You can't improve what you don't measure.
Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention,
sincere effort, intelligent direction and skillful execution; it represents
the wise choice of many alternatives.


On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Mike Staver <sta...@fimble.com> wrote:

>  Yeah, I hated that parameter and a lack of GUI to change it. When you
> have many servers to patch, it's annoying to have to edit this value in an
> XML file over and over again. I understand it's value, and I think it's a
> good thing - but they could have taken a few extra hours of dev time to
> mimic the behavior of 10 instead of just going half way.
>
> On 1/21/2013 1:51 PM, Dawn Hoagland wrote:
>
> It was introduced in APSB12-06 released March of 2012.  They introduced
> the setting, defaulted it to 100, but didn't update the Administrator to
> allow editing from the GUI so it must be added directly in the XML.
>
>  http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb12-06.html
>
>
>  On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Ajas Mohammed <ajash...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Thanks Charlie for the detailed email. Yes, we are on 9.0 and we didnt
>> upgrade to 9.0.1. We used hotfix jar for 9.0 as advised on the adobe page. It
>> makes sense to protect those CFIDE folders you mentioned.
>>
>> One thing we did notice is that after the applying security hotfix, we
>> started to get this error 
>> "*coldfusion.filter.FormScope$PostParametersLimitExceededException:
>> POST parameters exceeds the maximum limit specified in the server*".
>> Quick google search led
>> <http://www.cutterscrossing.com/index.cfm/2012/3/27/ColdFusion-Security-Hotfix-and-Big-Forms>me
>> to this 
>> post<http://www.cutterscrossing.com/index.cfm/2012/3/27/ColdFusion-Security-Hotfix-and-Big-Forms>.
>> I ended up adding <var 
>> name='postParametersLimit'><number>500.0</number></var>
>> to the {ColdFusion-Home}/lib/neo-runtime.xml for Server installation. I am
>> guessing that we might have missed an earlier patch/hotfix in which
>> Adobe introduced this postParametersLimit setting. We were surprised by
>> error message in the beginning but since we had recently applied the security
>> fix, we knew it had to do with fix.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> <Ajas Mohammed />
>> http://ajashadi.blogspot.com
>> We cannot become what we need to be, remaining what we are.
>> No matter what, find a way. Because thats what winners do.
>> You can't improve what you don't measure.
>> Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention,
>> sincere effort, intelligent direction and skillful execution; it represents
>> the wise choice of many alternatives.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Charlie Arehart <char...@carehart.org>wrote:
>>
>>>  :-)
>>>
>>> Thanks. I will note that they did just yesterday kindly add me to the
>>> acknowledgements section of the security advisory, a first for me. :-)
>>> Various issues caused the delay. Nothing nefarious. I got a call from
>>> someone on PSIRT explaining the situation. I was just happy to get the
>>> mention.
>>>
>>> The good news is that I’ve gotten “payment” by a burst of new business
>>> from people needing help with this. Of course, I posted the first two
>>> entries making no mention of my services. That really wasn’t my motivation.
>>> But come, the work has. And some of those have then realized I could help
>>> with other things, which has led to still more work, so it’s been all the
>>> more beneficial.
>>>
>>> Of course, it’s a bit like being a roofer after a tornado blows through.
>>> You don’t want to say you’re “glad for the work”, as you feel for people
>>> who were affected.
>>>
>>> I have a part 4/post mortem in the works, but sadly too busy to get time
>>> to write it up. Perhaps over the weekend.
>>>
>>> /charlie
>>>
>>>  *From:* ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] *On Behalf Of *Steve
>>> Ross
>>> *Sent:* Friday, January 18, 2013 10:17 AM
>>> *To:* ACFUG ColdFusion Discussion
>>> *Subject:* Re: [ACFUG Discuss] New CF Vulnerability - Check your servers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Adobe should be paying you Charlie...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Ajas Mohammed <ajash...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Charlie, Cameron for keeping us updated with the latest.
>>>
>>> Charlie, thanks for those blog entries. Really appreciate all your help.
>>>
>>>  <Ajas Mohammed />
>>>
>>>
>>>  -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
>>> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
>>>
>>> For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
>>> Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
>>> List hosted by FusionLink <http://www.fusionlink.com>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>  --
> Dawn
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
>
> For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
> Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
> List hosted by FusionLink <http://www.fusionlink.com>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>

Reply via email to