No, both files were same size and same name. I guess when I downloaded first file couple of yrs back, I had downloaded it as developer edition 64 bit and then when I downloaded few months back, it was straight 64 bit and It got me thinking, what if I install CF 9.0 (yes 9.0 this time) using developer installer and if it doesnt work , I will be in bit of bother. But apparently not, as installers are same, license will trigger Enterprise version. :-)
Thanks, <Ajas Mohammed /> iUseDropbox(http://db.tt/63Lvone9) http://ajashadi.blogspot.com We cannot become what we need to be, remaining what we are. No matter what, find a way. Because thats what winners do. You can't improve what you don't measure. Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives. On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Charlie Arehart <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks for the clarifications. As for the CF9 backwards licensing, the > good news is that a CF 9 license is indeed for any version: 9.0, 9.0.1, or > 9.0.2. :-) > > As for your having the 2 files, the old and one from a few months, if they > are the same, I thought you had said you found one had a different size. > Was that still some other? > > As for your last comment, to be clear, that’s why I did add, “assuming > that’s what you have or had and are trying to recreate”. :-) That said, I > would wonder why one on 9 would not want to move to 9.0.1. It’s free, and > does add some useful new functionality (for coders and for admins). But I > do appreciate you may feel you need to test first. Just saying it’s worth > considering. :-) Fortunately, Adobe does indeed still provide updates for > 9.0, 9.0.1, and 9.0.2, so you’re not missing out there, though it does mean > people need to be sure to apply the right fix for the right version! :-) > > /charlie > > **** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ajas > Mohammed > *Sent:* Thursday, April 11, 2013 12:58 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF 9 64 bit installer file**** > > ** ** > > Point noted. CF 9.0 It is from now. :-) Makes sense to me. I always > thought cf 9 means 9.0 and people mention 9.0.1 and 9.0.2 if they happen to > use that *specific* version, I didn't know/realize 9.0.2 could be read as > cf 9 or vice versa also.**** > > About Cf 10, i mentioned it, because someone would say, why dont you start > with fresh install (new servers right) of CF 10 and dont worry about > upgrades in future. It seems you can buy CF10 and request adobe for CF 9.0 > license via backwards licensing. Different topic but thats what we plan to > do. Not sure if that is 9.0.2 license. I am assuming they give you 9.0 > license and not 9.0.1 or 9.0.2. I dont know if the version matters in case > of a license, specific to 9.0 and 9.0.x.**** > > About installers, well I had an old (2yr old perhaps) installer and also > one which i downloaded few months back and size is same on both > ColdFusion_9_WWE_win64.exe. I just didnt know which one to trust as good > source. Sorry for confusion. > > Finally, do note that you will need to do 9.0, then 9.0.1, then the CHFs > and HFs for 9.0.1 on top of that, to get you to the latest version you can > have of 9.0.1, assuming that’s what you have or had and are trying to > recreate.**** > > About this, we dont want to do 9.0.1 as we never did that on our current > prodn servers or QA servers. We want to stay with 9.0 only with latest > security hotfixes of course.**** > > <Ajas Mohammed /> **** > > ** ** > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ > http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform > > For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists > Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ > List hosted by FusionLink <http://www.fusionlink.com> > ------------------------------------------------------------- >
