sure has come a long way since it was known as DHTML
http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/12/one-millionth-tower-documentary-elevates-the-art-of-html5/



Douglas Knudsen
http://www.cubicleman.com
this is my signature, like it?


On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]>wrote:

> You can still do quite a bit with HTML and CSS, 5 or otherwise.  Adobe's
> Edge experiment even appears at it's core to be an attempt to rebuild
> substantial parts of the Flash player using JS.  Part of Adobe's marketing
> push for Flex included promoting the idea that HTML simply doesn't do what
> Flex does.  In a few cases this may be true, but I would invite you to
> seriously look at the insane awesome things some people are doing with
> HTML/CSS/JS out there.
>
> Also - I think adoption of HTML5 is going to continue to accelerate faster
> than historical browser tech has, especially on mobile.  People tend to
> replace their phones every 18-24 months, even if they do not update their
> desktop browser.  This means mobile's going to rapidly start leading
> broadly in browser capabilities, ahead of desktops.  The mobile arms race
> between Apple and Google will also drive this to happen faster.
>
> Titanium is one platform that runs HTML on both mobile and the desktop.
>  Realistically, it's already delivering what Flex Mobile has been trying to
> deliver for a number of years.  And Titanium does it using HTML.
>
> As for the rest of the Flash Player questions, I think they wil continue
> to develop the desktop Flash Player till it's market share dwindles to
> nothing...
>
> -Cameron
>
>
>  On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Laurence MacNeill <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ok, so maybe HTML5 is the *future* of mobile & desktop apps, but what
>> about *right now*?  I guess we continue working with Flex and Flash
>> Builder? Because HTML5 damn sure ain't ready for prime-time yet. Seems like
>> Adobe is committed enough to Flex that they'll be releasing Flash Builder
>> 4.6 in a month. And we should be good with that for at least another year,
>> or perhaps two, right?
>>
>> And none of this answers the Flash Player question... Are they gonna quit
>> developing new versions of the Flash player eventually? Damn, I wish they'd
>> been more thorough in their blog-post... Too many unanswered questions...
>>
>>
>> --
> Cameron Childress
> --
> p:   678.637.5072
> im: cameroncf
> facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cameroncf> | 
> twitter<http://twitter.com/cameronc> |
> google+ <https://profiles.google.com/u/0/117829379451708140985>
>
>
>

Reply via email to