I think this is a bad week. driconf was rejected from Savannah hosting because Savannah does not now even allow GPL'd manuals, as GPL is not an FDL-compatible licence. See http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=5214
There seems a change of policy, despite the redacted blog post. Savannah *allowed* non-free-software non-program licences, but didn't *require* them before. The original blog post can be seen at http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/02/msg00210.html Of course, with no easy way to decide when documentation source is not otherwise source, the new policy makes Savannah decisions random. On the one hand, this list gets good news suggesting that at least the ambiguities in the FDL will be fixed. On the other, Savannah inflames the dispute over FDL 1.2. What happens next? Bluely, -- MJ Ray - personal email, see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Work: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ irc.oftc.net/slef Jabber/SIP ask _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
