On 11-Feb-2006, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > [...] the English language allows for writting non-functional > pieces. Can you explain why you need the right to modify my poem > about dragons?
Because I find it useful as the basis of my own work. As with works licensed under the GPL, I would find it a reasonable requirement that I note the copyright holder of the existing work, and note that I made modifications. > And why I shouldn't be allowed to attach it to a manual? I have been arguing that one *should* be allowed to combine such works together and redistribute, just as with programs. -- \ "bash awk grep perl sed, df du, du-du du-du, vi troff su fsck | `\ rm * halt LART LART LART!" -- The Swedish BOFH, | _o__) alt.sysadmin.recovery | Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
