On 12-Feb-2006, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > If I like that poem [that is in part of your work under FDL > do-not-modify-or-remove restriction], I may want to base my own > poem on it, taking parts of it and combining it seamlessly with > my own work. > > Maybe we are from two different worlds, this is what is usually a > basis for scientific articles. Where you never copy the actual > material at hand unless you quote it properly, and only reference > it.
Now that we know what's I'm asking, can you answer the question: why do you believe that a license restricting me from taking part of your work that I find useful, and exercising the freedom to modify, combine with my own work, and redistribute, is somehow a free license? -- \ "I took it easy today. I just pretty much layed around in my | `\ underwear all day. ... Got kicked out of quite a few places, | _o__) though." -- Bug-Eyed Earl, _Red Meat_ | Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
