[Please don't send me copies of messages to the list.] Sorry, but I can't keep track of who is or isn't subscribed to this list. It is normal practise to always CC everyone.
> What do you think of the suggestion made to draw lines similar > to those drawn by the Debian project: "free", "free but > currently depends on non-free", "non-free". > > A bad idea, since just like Debian, you end up recommending and > condoning non-free software by recommending businesses that > perform unethical practises. I don't see how you make this connection. Why would a classification as I suggested necessarily "end up" as a recommendation? Since these companies will be listed as GBN friendly companies (with a little sign saying something about their "status"), you tell users that these companies are OK. When infact, they are not, since they recommend/develop non-free software. What is the point to classify businesses that do something that is not acceptable? Cheers (and bed time for me) _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
