On 26-Jun-2006, Yavor Doganov wrote: > Ben Finney wrote: > > The definition and goal of Debian has always been to make an > > entirely free operating system, ever since the original documents > > creating the project. > > I must admit that this is the only thing that made me a Debian user.
It seems we agree on the definition of Debian then. Thanks, that's what I wanted to clarify. > > What are you implying has changed, or will change? > > I don't know, but how can you explain [behaviour of the project > members] While you make many points I've made or agreed with in the past, I don't think the discussion is appropriate for this list. Bringing it back on topic, the definition of Debian and the surrounding project (regardless what the project members do from time to time) was raised to discuss how those definitions might be useful for defining the GNU Business Network. What do you think of the suggestion made to draw lines similar to those drawn by the Debian project: "free", "free but currently depends on non-free", "non-free". -- \ "One time I went to a drive-in in a cab. The movie cost me | `\ ninety-five dollars." -- Steven Wright | _o__) | Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
