Hello Niall, your statements are extremely important and deserve attention because GPLv3 cannot afford leaving ambiguity or generate incompatibility with what you say below.
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 09:04 +0100, Niall Douglas wrote: > For example, as far as I understood revision 2, it COULD be > incompatible with BSD licensing, COULD be incompatible with > authentication signing keys (ie; this binary was made by > me), COULD be incompatible with permitting GPL v3 binaries to be > transferred over a SSL connection Can you please point out the precise wordings that in your opinion could lead to such incompatibilities? I couldn't see these problems (although I found others and submitted comments). Did you submit your comments? thanks stef _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
