I should have been more clear, I was trying to avoid being rude to ams.
I fail to see where you were rude to me in anyway. It was a truncation of a longer response where I was saying that ams should not have kept out of politics. I meant that the participation methods of FSF act as a selector of participants thus rendering ams conclusion meaningless, and supporting you. Sorry not to have been clear enough. I wasn't confused before, but now I am, I don't understand the two above sentences at all. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
