* Alfred M. Szmidt wrote, On 27/09/06 11:44: > > You say that simply because you cannot use it how _you_ want, the > > whole system must be junked, you could simply install a > > webbrowser and use the system, or a PDF viewer, all of this is > > free software and not very hard to do. PDF viewers and web > > browsers are the most basic tools these days. > > > > Maybe if you paid the people who made the whole GPLv3 commenting > > infrastructure you might get what you want, but until then, they > > are going to work on something the majority of people can use > > easily, and they have done a wonderful job achiving that IMHO. > > This is why you should not have kept out of politics. > > The participation mechanism acts as a pre-selector of > participants. How are we to know how many would-be participants are > excluded and silent because the participation mechanism excluded > them. > > Nobody has excluded MJ, he is quite free to add such a feature him > self, or pay someone to do it. > I haven't said that MJ was excluded. I merely commented that your opinion of the system being usable by those who used it was content free. I merely commented that FSF are hard put to show that it wasn't a selective exclusion should someone make the claim. > The rest of your post I simply do not understand. >
Well, as I say, you shouldn't have avoided politics. Sam _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
