"Shane M. Coughlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just a FYI for everyone here; earlier this year I was talking to Gerv at > Mozilla about these things. [...]
And I'm sorry to inform everyone that "Gerv is not responsible at this time for trademark permissions or approvals" (says Mike Connor in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354622;msg=59 ) and Gerv's reasonably fair approach to free software is apparently being systematically reversed by the Mozilla Corporation, right at a time that maximises disruption to the debian project. It seems that MozCorp wants veto rights over debian package maintenance and release policies, else the browser can't be Firefox. Go IceWeasel! -- MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Somerset, England. Work/Laborejo: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request/peteble _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
