On 31-Jan-2007, Matthias Kirschner wrote: > Does anyone know if it makes sense if I add > > aso10.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (it was always this) to mailman's privacy > options:
That's a treadmill that only ever gets faster. It would block that one host, but it would mean you need to maintain that field in Mailman from now on. I think that rejecting messages suspected as spam is better done by the receiving MTA, not later. That way, you've got the calling party on the line (so to speak) and you don't need to make a "generate a new message or drop this one on the floor" decision, you just reject it to the SMTP client. -- \ "If you go parachuting, and your parachute doesn't open, and | `\ you friends are all watching you fall, I think a funny gag | _o__) would be to pretend you were swimming." -- Jack Handey | Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
