* Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-01 09:52:27 +1100]: > On 31-Jan-2007, Matthias Kirschner wrote: > > Does anyone know if it makes sense if I add > > > > aso10.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (it was always this) to mailman's privacy > > options: > > That's a treadmill that only ever gets faster. It would block that one > host, but it would mean you need to maintain that field in Mailman > from now on. > > I think that rejecting messages suspected as spam is better done by > the receiving MTA, not later. That way, you've got the calling party > on the line (so to speak) and you don't need to make a "generate a new > message or drop this one on the floor" decision, you just reject it to > the SMTP client.
Ok, than I will not do this. Thank you, Matze -- Join the Fellowship and protect your freedom! (http://www.fsfe.org) _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
