"Gareth Bowker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...and yet before UTUTO-e, "even" RMS used Debian.
I doubt that RMS used any proprietary software packages on his Debian
system. At that time one could use Debian without running non-free
software. Anyway.
The point is not whether you personally would use proprietary software
on your phone, but whether FSFE will distribute non-free software to
users. This is a very bad (and sad) example. It looks like it's not
so unethical to distribute non-free software. Any vendor can point to
FSFE and say: "Even FSFE distributes non-free software, so why don't
we?"
"Fellowship Raffle 2007: Time to give back" -- I'm sick of it.
--
Protect your digital freedom and privacy, eliminate DRM, learn more at
http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm
_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
