On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 17:10 +0200, Carsten Agger wrote: > This means that even when more and more free software becomes > available, people might still become increasingly obliged to use > non-free software through the web, or to use free software as web > applications under conditions where the four freedoms don't apply. I'm > sure the question isn't new and others could state it much more > eloquently, but ... > > is the an answer, and which would be the right one?
At the end of the day, people running software privately don't have to share it. Someone who modifies a GPL'd web app and makes the improved version available for use doesn't have to share their private modifications - they have the rights to share it, they just don't want to, much as I might improve my server's copy of Apache and not give copies to the people who use that server. I don't think this is really about being free software or not free software; where someone declines to give out copies of something they have it's a privacy thing, not a freedom thing, and free software licenses respect privacy. I suspect the real issue here is whether or not people have the ability to move from one service to another, and bring their data with them. That's an open standards argument, much like DRM. You might be interested in some of the discussions going on around GUADEC, vis.: http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/18/four-quick-notes-on-havocs-keynote/ Cheers, Alex. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
