On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:59:11AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > Oleg Verych wrote: > > > > [just a note] > > And just a sidenote: pay attention to the mailing list you're sending > this to. Most of the list subscribers are well aware about these > issues and presumably have already oriented themselves.
Thank you for the clarification. Nevertheless somebody seems doesn't see the difference unfortunately... > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 09:25:22PM +0100, Alex Hudson wrote: > > > First, free software is very good at being decentralised: git, > > > > What do mean `git'? GNU Interactive Tools or that one authored by > > Linus Torvalds? Latter isn't free software it's open source. > > It is free software because the author(s) chose a license that is a > free software license. The views of the authors regarding the free > software movement and its goals are irrelevant. However, namely these > antagonistic views are a reason (valid or not) for some people, > including myself, not to use their software when viable alternaives > exist. This is also irrelevant to the issue -- git (the VCS) is free > software regardless. Whatever. Really. I've subscribed here due to closed archives. Now i see why i should leave. | I don't call Linux "Free Software". I haven't called it that for close to | ten years! Because I think the term "Open Source" is a lot better. `--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-- If you care to prove your talk, please see more: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Talking is most easiest part of all that thing... Goodbye and sorry for my bad English. ____ _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
