On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 23:03 +0100, Carsten Agger wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Sam Liddicott wrote: > > > Sorry for top quoting (darn pocket outlook, roll-on neo 1973) > > > > Your scenario is nearly right. > > > > What if the same person adds features to gcc as well. > > > > Are those features AGPL or GPL as gcc is gpl. > > I want then to be gpl, I think they would be AGPl. > > Well, since the features added would be part of the work for which the > GPLv3 "will continue to apply", they will be GPLv3. > > Any changes which can be isolated to a part covered by the GPLv3 will be > GPLv3. Only such changes as apply to the parts covered by the AGPL or > the work as a whole (i.e., glue connecting the two parts) will be AGPL. > > At least that's how I read it.
This is how I read it too so far. Simo. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
