-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sam Liddicott wrote:
> Sorry for top quoting (darn pocket outlook, roll-on neo 1973) > > Your scenario is nearly right. > > What if the same person adds features to gcc as well. > > Are those features AGPL or GPL as gcc is gpl. > I want then to be gpl, I think they would be AGPl. Well, since the features added would be part of the work for which the GPLv3 "will continue to apply", they will be GPLv3. Any changes which can be isolated to a part covered by the GPLv3 will be GPLv3. Only such changes as apply to the parts covered by the AGPL or the work as a whole (i.e., glue connecting the two parts) will be AGPL. At least that's how I read it. - -- http://www.modspil.dk/itpolitik -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHR03zletyW1YzdSERAoZWAJ9zGlrrDlGpZ53RdR73mLst/ZjFtQCeOOBO bd47NZ9CQbMgOD97S5FxVco= =AGjE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
