On 01-Feb-2008, David Gerard wrote: > On 01/02/2008, Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You could switch to a different mail client, such as mutt, which > > provides the functionality of highlighting emails in colour. I > > believe Thunderbird and Outlook offer the same. > > I moved *from* Mutt *to* Gmail.
That's unfortunate, because (if I understand rightly) gmail offers very little control over how messages are processed. If I'm wrong, and gmail *does* offer a lot of control, then please use that control to control your mail the way you're wanting to do. > (I love replies to feature requests that say "You don't actually > want to do what you want to do, you want to do what *I* do.") Notice that it is you asking for *everyone's* mail from this list to be affected, just to suit the way *you* want it to appear. That's far better solved by presentation in *your* mail client, because doing so doesn't impose anything on anyone else. The messages already contain exactly the right information to do so: a field that uniquely identifies the list from which the message came. -- \ "God forbid that any book should be banned. The practice is as | `\ indefensible as infanticide." -- Dame Rebecca West | _o__) | Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
