[whoops, meant to send to list] On 05/02/2008, David Picón Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Clearly, I can't recommend to use a license and infringe it: What > > license would you recommend for those who like the FDL but are > > unwilling to reveal their LaTeX sources? > It depends on what is it you like about FDL. Perhaps a Creative Commons > attribution, no-derives, would serve your purposes? No-derives since, hiding > the source seems to be directed towards that aim, although I'm not sure why > you don't want to expose your LaTeX, so can't say. Note also that PDFs aren't all that uneditable. If you don't have a copy of the full proprietary Adobe Acrobat, there's PDFedit, which is currently pretty rough but looks promising: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfedit If people can see it, they can copy and change it. - d. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
