On 2/5/08, David Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [whoops, meant to send to list] > > On 05/02/2008, David Picón Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Clearly, I can't recommend to use a license and infringe it: What > > > license would you recommend for those who like the FDL but are > > > unwilling to reveal their LaTeX sources? > > > It depends on what is it you like about FDL. Perhaps a Creative Commons > > attribution, no-derives, would serve your purposes? No-derives since, hiding > > the source seems to be directed towards that aim, although I'm not sure why > > you don't want to expose your LaTeX, so can't say. > > > Note also that PDFs aren't all that uneditable. If you don't have a > copy of the full proprietary Adobe Acrobat, there's PDFedit, which is > currently pretty rough but looks promising: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfedit > > If people can see it, they can copy and change it.
A side note: PDF is set to become the ISO 32000 Standard(http://blogs.adobe.com/spartacusacrobat/2008/01/pdf_iso_standard.html) bye --- Stefano Spinucci _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
