Alex Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > playing games like this will make people distrust > the "or later" clauses.
Let's assess the risks first: > If people choose GFDL, it's pretty bloody > obvious (to me) that the relaxed CC-BY-SA license isn't what they wanted. This is a non-issue for Wikipedia because each contributor owns their contributions - not the Wikimedia Foundation. There can be no hostile change of licence there. Is there a project that will be eligible for this clause and for which the copyright isn't held by the contributors? -- Ciarán O'Riordan, +32 477 36 44 19, http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ Support free software, join FSFE's Fellowship: http://fsfe.org Recent blog entries: http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/status_of_fsfe_s_legal_dept_ftf http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/fsfe_s_antitrust_victory_with_samba http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/openstreetmap_considers_new_licence http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/why_european_software_patents_are_legally_invalid _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
