Ciaran O'Riordan wrote: >> If people choose GFDL, it's pretty bloody >> obvious (to me) that the relaxed CC-BY-SA license isn't what they wanted. >> > > This is a non-issue for Wikipedia because each contributor owns their > contributions - not the Wikimedia Foundation. There can be no hostile > change of licence there. >
What does copyright ownership have to do with the point I raised? Are you seriously saying that someone can't now arbitrarily relicense Wikipedia content as CC-BY-SA? Cheers, Alex. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
