On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 16:48 +0100, Matthias Kirschner wrote: > * simo <[email protected]> [2008-12-13 10:35:25 -0500]: > > > > * KwangErn Liew <[email protected]> [2008-12-13 10:12:19 +0100]: > > > > > > > Not sure if it's applicable, but at work we use Foxit Reader > > > > http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/rd_intro.php > > > > > > Foxit is non-free software: > > > http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/rd_eula.htm > > > > Then you should probably use the domain name freepdfreaders.org, or are > > you implicitly deceiving consumers ? > > Do you have to explain everything in the URL? Than we should use: > pdfreaderswiththefreedomtousestudyshareandimprove.org ;)
no that would be quite too much :) > I think the text on the page makes it totally clear that we list only > Free Software pdfreaders. Yes I know you do, but yet the domain name by itself seem to imply a site that deal with PDF readers in general. Seem an unfortunate thing. > And I would consider it immoral to list non-free software. I would never ask the FSFE to do something like that, and I praise the initiative (except for the domain name :). Simo. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
