On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 16:14 +0100, Carsten Agger wrote: > On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 12:57 +0100, Bjoern Schiessle wrote: > > Hi Carsten, > > > > Carsten Agger <[email protected]> writes: > > > But yes, it does mean you can't write BSD-licensed code with ExtJS. But > > > in that case, people who want their code to be under a BSD license > > > always have the option of not using the library. > > > > You can write BSD-licensed code while uing a GPL licensed library. In > > fact you can license your code under every GPL compatible license[1]. > > > > As long as your license is GPL compatible you and everyone else can > > combine your code with GPL licensed code, e.g. also with ExtJS. > > example. > > My bad - thanks for clearing that up! This makes the notion of having a > library under the GPL a lot more reasonable IMO.
Just keep in mind that when you distribute a work that has GPL parts, the *whole* work needs to be distributed following the terms of the GPL for distribution. Just a Rule of Thumb, I know there are dissenting opinions and interpretation for corner cases etc.. etc... :) Simo. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
