Martin Gollowitzer <[email protected]> > * MJ Ray <[email protected]> [120112 16:18, > > Also, I feel like I should be able to just send in proposed bugfixes, > > so I try to get the source code, which then led me to find that > > related bug of xml mislabelled as xhtml that sidetracked me. > > Well, the file extension itself says nothing about the content. Still it > is probably true that the FSFE webserver should not serve these files as > application/xhtml+xml files, but rather as application/xml or text/xml > (I'm Ccing web@ on this again).
True about the extension, but as you note the Content-Type is also xhtml. Then you get into a related question about whether it's a bug with the website or the browsers if a browser attempts to display that not-quite-xhtml as if it is xhtml. A link to /contribute/web/ or README.texi alongside the source code link is another way it could be made less confusing. Or there could be some link in the source file that gets hidden when the page is compiled. Lots of possible resolutions. Good luck choosing. Regards, -- MJ Ray, Software Engineering Specialist, www.software.coop member. (# number in subject emails = copy to all workers unless asked.) Turo Technology LLP, reg'd in England+Wales, number OC303457 Reg. Office: 36 Orchard Cl., Kewstoke, Somerset, GB-BS22 9XY _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
