Am Samstag, den 14.01.2012, 18:56 +0000 schrieb MJ Ray: > Decisions about one's own work for the team seemed to be usually taken > by the team, even when they do not affect anyone else much.
I have worked in a number of teams and never experienced this. It seems to me that you made an experience in a specific case (you proposed a change of license of our web pages) which was turned down, could it be that you're generalizing from this a little too much? > > Even worse: the process is flexible and up to the group to define, as > > well as all members of the group are fine with it. Sorry I just saw I wrote nonsense: it should of course mean "as *long* as all members of the group are fine with it". > > I know that some Fellowship groups make decisions while they meet > > over a beer. > > To such groups, I wish a abstemious temperance teetotaller! I said over *a* beer ;-) > [... 3. Decisions never reported ...] > > FWIW, I don't think that this is a matter of democracy, it's a matter of > > communication. > > I think it's both. Communication is necessary for democracy. Communication *inside* a democratic organisation is of course necessary for democracy. Certainly we can also improve that, but in this thread we were (or at least I was) talking about communication to the outside. Thanks, Reinhard
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
