* Hugo Roy: > Some background on the Bacula case is available here > https://fsfe.org/activities/ftf/bacula-agreement.en.html > > The bit that contradicts directly what you are saying is: > > FSFE does not endorse the existence of a non-free version, but > FSFE cannot forbid authors to execute the rights granted by > copyright in their own work, as long as this does not limit > the scope of fiduciary's exclusive license.
The web page has markedly different content from the PDF file. You need to read the latter and check what software is covered. > The permission to make proprietary software was absolutely not > granted by FSFE, but directly by developers (who hold copyright in > their contributions). The wording in the agreement does not restrict its scope to Bacula code that had already been licensed to Bacula Systems by its authors. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
