* Matija Šuklje: > Exactly. The only reason why Bacula is able to pull off the proprietary > version is that parallel to the FLA assigning the right to FSFE, all the > contributors also signed a CA to Kern.
Please point out where in the FSFE/Bacula Systems agreement the license grant under B(1) is restricted to Bacula code. > The only reason why Bacula is able to pull off the proprietary > version is that parallel to the FLA assigning the right to FSFE, all > the contributors also signed a CA to Kern. I expect that most "Beneficiaries" who have signed FLAs with FSFE would be rather surprised that "Bacula Systems S.A. respectively Kern Sibbald has the right to use, reproduce, modify, redistribute and make available software based on [their] contributions and resulting software 'under other licenses' including under a proprietary license as the Bacula Enterprise Version, in accordance with Section 3 (2) of the FLA.". _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
