Hi Tom, We’ve written some guidance on this topic:
http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2013/03/21/open-source-meets-open-standards/ <http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2013/03/21/open-source-meets-open-standards/> http://oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/openstandardsopensource <http://oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/openstandardsopensource> There isn’t a single answer as different standards setting organisations have different rules, and different participation. Hope this helps, S > On 29 May 2015, at 13:56, Tom Blecher <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello people, > am I the only person on the planet who sees a connection > > -of the vast nonexistence of free software in fields > -and this fields are governed -more or less- by standardization companies as > Beuth-Verlag, who offers them standards for fee? > > And therefore finds it necessary to solve the problem? > Maybe not, maybe not even the first one. > So I ask here: > By which means could one a) and b) does one (fsf) usually tackle the problem? > For me to be able to support you. > Thanks in advance > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk [email protected] [email protected] http://scottbw.wordpress.com @scottbw
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
