Hi Scott,
did I forget to mention that I were after ISO, DIN and Beuth? So for the non Germans lets forget about DIN and Beuth and focus on ISO. These kind of documents are not to be called: "royalty free", are not they?
So I read and scanned your text provided. And I found no explicit mention of this kinds of documents in these texts.
Is this kind of documents covered?
In (or outside of) what is document-freedom-days claiming "open standards"?
Tia
29.05.2015, 15:18, "Scott Wilson" <[email protected]>:
Hi Tom,We’ve written some guidance on this topic:There isn’t a single answer as different standards setting organisations have different rules, and different participation.Hope this helps,SOn 29 May 2015, at 13:56, Tom Blecher <[email protected]> wrote:Hello people,am I the only person on the planet who sees a connection-of the vast nonexistence of free software in fields-and this fields are governed -more or less- by standardization companies as Beuth-Verlag, who offers them standards for fee?And therefore finds it necessary to solve the problem?Maybe not, maybe not even the first one.So I ask here:By which means could one a) and b) does one (fsf) usually tackle the problem?For me to be able to support you.Thanks in advance_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussionOSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research@scottbw
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
