Le 24 septembre 2015 11:25:11 GMT+02:00, Sam Liddicott <[email protected]> a écrit : >On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Hugo Roy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ↪ 2015-09-23 Wed 17:11, Sam Liddicott <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Of course the license also covers distribution of works, not >development. >> >> Technically, the GPL covers all works “based on the [GPL] program” so >> it does cover developped works and not just the distribution of such >> works. Of course, the main obligations arise when you distribute such >> covered software which is why a lot of the focus is on distribution. > >To be clear, I was trying to state that it does not cover the ongoing >development (verb) of such works. > >To my understanding, works can be developed and also used privately by >the developer in the case where the licensing combinations do not >permit copying as coverd by copyright law. > >Sam >_______________________________________________ >Discussion mailing list >[email protected] >https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Why do you think that? Can you elaborate? -- Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
