On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Greg Swallow <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> As I mentioned, I think this is a problem for SME - and if you aren't
>> interested in the answer, it is a very big problem.
>
>
> You said SME Server was more simplified and less flexible that CentOS. That
> makes no sense, of course it is. SME Server uses a subset of packages from
> CentOS and has a simplified admin interface. That is not a design flaw,
> that is the design.
It is, and it both limits the places it is useful and selects a
community of users that are unable or uninterested in improving it.
And I see that as a problem for the distribution. Perhaps not for the
small set of developers that simplified the design to fit exactly
their own needs, but for anyone else or for the future.
--
Les Mikesell
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Discussion about project organisation and overall direction
To unsubscribe, e-mail [email protected]
Searchable archive at http://lists.contribs.org/mailman/public/discussion/
