Hey, any reason not to continue with branching the actual releases? Like it was done with the previous release; I created branches named "release_2010-11-17" of openwrt-xburst and openwrt-packages, so the the tree got fixed.
Branches can now be defined within feeds.conf(.default) as well. cheers mirko On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 12:24 +0800, Xiangfu Liu wrote: very thanks David. > > committed at: http://qi-hw.com/p/openwrt-xburst/692c1e4 > > On 12/21/2010 05:30 AM, David Kuehling wrote: > .... > > > > I think we should really modify the default feeds.conf provided with > > openwrt-packages.git to explicitely list known-good revisions only, such > > as: > > > > src-svn packages svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/packa...@24563 > > > > This way we're sure that everybody working with openwrt-xburst is going > > to build the same packages resulting in the same image. > > > > Then upgrading to newer openwrt upstream packages is done centrally > > (e.g. by you), _after_ checking that the new upstream revision actually > > works. This way people like me who don't have the time and cpu > > resources to test-build config.full_system won't complain all the time > > :) > > > > For qi-packages.git I think we can still leave everything as it is, > > since these packages are somewhat under our control. > > > > cheers, > > > > David > > > -- This email address is used for mailinglist purposes only. Non-mailinglist emails will be dropped automatically. If you want to get in contact with me personally, please mail to: mirko.vogt <at> nanl <dot> de _______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
