Hi Mirko, David Kuehling I think we should use "tag" not "branch", so basically is like this:
1. when we try to release openwrt image. make a "git tag" 2. copy the feeds.conf to images files, include the svn revision in this feeds.conf[1] we should not add any svn revision to "master" feeds.conf, (I have reverted my change on feeds.conf) I don't think we will develop a lot in "branch" then later merge back to "master". it split people from "master", we should stick all developers in "master". for my understanding, "branch" mean someone will develop on that. which is not fit us for now:) [1]http://downloads.qi-hardware.com/software/images/NanoNote/Ben/2010-12-14/feeds.conf On 12/22/2010 12:18 AM, Mirko Vogt wrote: > Hey, > > any reason not to continue with branching the actual releases? > Like it was done with the previous release; I created branches named > "release_2010-11-17" of openwrt-xburst and openwrt-packages, so the the > tree got fixed. > > Branches can now be defined within feeds.conf(.default) as well. > > cheers _______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
