Hello. On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 04:39, Werner Almesberger wrote: > Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > Are you actually using two different PIDs for normal operation and DFU > > mode? > > Hmm, once I had wormed my way through the convoluted bureaucracy of > USB, I realized with happiness that one PID should work for both > cases, as the interface descriptor would clearly distinguish the > different uses.
Well, it is only a suggestion in the DFU spec. You can still go with one PID. Personally I see benefit in two different PIDs clearly seperating the DFU and the normal operation mode though. > But now that you mention it, there does seem to be a general > reluctance to make full use of the wealth of information the > standard obligates us to provide ... Thats the normal practice in dealing with big specs, no? Just get the minimum running and go with it. ;) > > Given that qi-hw has an own vendor ID I think it would be easy enough > > to apply another PID for this. What do you think? > > Alright, I'll dig out those PID application forms ... http://en.qi-hardware.com/wiki/USB_product_ID_assignments Thats how Wolfgang descriped the Qi process for assigning new PIDs :) regards Stefan Schmidt _______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
