I just thought maybe someone could sue us if the device got too good or
if our license expired on the MIPS thing.
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 06:43:51 +0000, Wolfgang Spraul wrote:
So is the future secure for both this Nanonote and the (theoretical)
next one?
Why should it not be secure? In order to build the world's best
computing devices (of course with free technology since I think
that's the only way to make the world's best stuff in X years), we
focus on two priorities:
1) reduce maintenance costs of our platform
2) make it cheaper to manufacture improved devices
That makes for a secure future.
Cheers,
Wolfgang
_______________________________________________
Qi Hardware Discussion List
Mail to list (members only): [email protected]
Subscribe or Unsubscribe:
http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
_______________________________________________
Qi Hardware Discussion List
Mail to list (members only): [email protected]
Subscribe or Unsubscribe:
http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
