_______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
I am wondering what you all think about how far I, or any of us, for
that matter, should go with hacking on the Ben. For one, Qi adapted
OpenWRT rather than made a new distribution from (near) scratch. Was
this due to time constraints, or something else? Would it be worth it
for someone to learn the MIPS architecture sufficiently well to make a
Ben Tailored OS? Or, since the new Nanonote may or may not have a
similar chip, is it better to stay "on the surface" as it were and not
get too involved in low-level stuff? Maybe the experience alone of deep
MIPS knowledge will be worth it even if we move to another chip in the
future? If one does not go deeper than the kernel and other basic utils,
I suppose "from scratch" would mean getting a custom kernel and utils,
tuning them, then building from there, right? I think in general, x86
GNU/Linux is assumed to be as optimized as it could be, but I'm not sure
about other architectures like ARM, MIPS, etc. Since someone has already
done the work, perhaps it is not good to try and re-do it...?
- How Far Should I go? cenobyte
- Colemak issue cenobyte
- Re: Colemak issue kyak
- Re: How Far Should I go? Alan Post
- Re: How Far Should I go? cenobyte
- Re: How Far Should I go? Alan Post
- Re: How Far Should I go? cenobyte
- Re: How Far Should I go? Alan Post
- Re: How Far Should I go? cenobyte
- Re: How Far Should I go? Alan Post
- Re: How Far Should I go? cenobyte

