> > The CC2541 would be TI's "official" BTLE chip, but since all its > goodies are closed we may just as well use the CC2543, which is > cheaper and smaller. > The nRF51822 looks pretty sexy but I'm reluctant to make yet another > RF chip change at the moment since this would a) delay the project > further, and b) one would have to go with a fine comb over the > documentation to see whether all that's needed is really there. > > I thing using the TI CC2543 is more on the same way that was your Nanonote WPAN, a hackable-not-blob-code RF solution. The only worry is if there'll be some open source BTLE stack available to code on the TI chip to avoid writing it from zero.
_______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
