Nordic chip sounds attractive. Changing now could be a sound decision. Sounds like a lower risk technically. If that causes a 90 day-ish delay so be it. Anelok has merit absent RF (at least for a while). On Apr 24, 2014 1:10 AM, "Felix" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The CC2541 would be TI's "official" BTLE chip, but since all its >> goodies are closed we may just as well use the CC2543, which is >> cheaper and smaller. >> > The nRF51822 looks pretty sexy but I'm reluctant to make yet another >> RF chip change at the moment since this would a) delay the project >> further, and b) one would have to go with a fine comb over the >> documentation to see whether all that's needed is really there. >> >> > I thing using the TI CC2543 is more on the same way that was your Nanonote > WPAN, a hackable-not-blob-code RF solution. The only worry is if there'll > be some open source BTLE stack available to code on the TI chip to avoid > writing it from zero. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qi Hardware Discussion List > Mail to list (members only): [email protected] > Subscribe or Unsubscribe: > http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion >
_______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
