On 21/08/17 12:51, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: > I think you mean "private software" which is only used by yorself, and > not shared to anyone, not even co-workers. Once you share it at least > with someone, it ought to be free/libre because it's no longer > "private".
My understanding of 'private' is not so much 'secret' as you have expressed here - but more like: 'subject to private property rights' which are distributed/published, *privately*. If you are suggesting that I ought to be legally and morally obliged to share all the software I produce under a FS license then that version of freedom isn't the version I would fight for. Freedom without autonomy is totalitarianism. with respect. / m _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
