Sorry... I think I wrote something wrong indeed (perhaps due to being tired at the time)... my mistake.
I didn't mean you are required to share every FS you write. Mat Witts <[email protected]> writes: > On 21/08/17 12:51, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: >> I think you mean "private software" which is only used by yorself, and >> not shared to anyone, not even co-workers. Once you share it at least >> with someone, it ought to be free/libre because it's no longer >> "private". > > My understanding of 'private' is not so much 'secret' as you have > expressed here - but more like: 'subject to private property rights' > which are distributed/published, *privately*. > > If you are suggesting that I ought to be legally and morally obliged to > share all the software I produce under a FS license then that version of > freedom isn't the version I would fight for. Freedom without autonomy is > totalitarianism. > > with respect. > > / m > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion > -- - https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno - Palestrante e consultor sobre /software/ livre (não confundir com gratis). - "WhatsApp"? Ele não é livre. Por favor, use o GNU Ring ou o Tox. - Contato: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno#vCard - Arquivos comuns aceitos (apenas sem DRM): Corel Draw, Microsoft Office, MP3, MP4, WMA, WMV. - Arquivos comuns aceitos e enviados: CSV, GNU Dia, GNU Emacs Org, GNU GIMP, Inkscape SVG, JPG, LibreOffice (padrão ODF), OGG, OPUS, PDF (apenas sem DRM), PNG, TXT, WEBM. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
