Many people say they didn't get the email they need for voting. We don't know how many got it, and who. Only you know. Why do you take all the power for this to you?
Is this election "not perfect"? I think this is a very nice word. I would say this election is only showbusiness. Hans Am So., 12. Mai 2019 um 13:10 Uhr schrieb Daniel Pocock <[email protected]>: > > On 11/05/2019 23:07, Johann Gross wrote: > > You say that "a few people today" did not get the email for voting? I > > think there is something very wrong with this election. > > You make all the rules. You say who may vote and who may not. And even > > people say they don't get the email they need to vote. > > How can we believe that this vote is fair and useful? > > > When FSFE secretly censors the last person you elected, they demonstrate > utter contempt for democracy and all of those who participated in the > last election, voters and candidates alike. > > As returning officer, it would be hard for me to go lower than that. > > Migrating the list to fsfellowship.eu has been controversial but hardly > disproportionate to that behaviour. > > There is no such thing as a perfect election, it is done on a > best-effort basis using a process that resembles the previous > elections. e-voting will always be e-voting. > > Regards, > > Daniel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion >
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
